# documentación de Django - 6.0.7

# Confirmando código

This section is addressed to the mergers and to anyone interested in knowing how code gets committed into Django. The Directrices de compromiso apply to all contributors, with or without commit rights.

If you’re a community member who wants to contribute code to Django, look at Working with Git and GitHub instead.

## Gestionando las pull requests

Dado que Django está alojado en GitHub, los parches se proporcionan en forma de pull requests.

Cuando envíe una solicitud de extracción, asegúrese de que cada una de ellas se ajusta a las directrices que se describen a continuación. Se espera que los colaboradores proporcionen los mejores pull requests posibles. En la práctica, las fusiones, que probablemente estarán más familiarizadas con las directrices de confirmación, pueden decidir actualizar ellas mismas una confirmación.

Es posible que desee que las acciones de Jenkins o GitHub prueben el pull request con uno de los constructores de pull request que no se ejecuta automáticamente, como Oracle o Selenium. Consulte la página wiki CI para obtener instrucciones.

Si te encuentras revisando pull requests localmente más a menudo, este alias de git te será útil:

    [alias]
        pr = !sh -c \"git fetch upstream pull/${1}/head:pr/${1} && git checkout pr/${1}\"

Añádelo a tu `~/.gitconfig`, y establece `upstream` como `django/django`. Luego puedes ejecutar `git pr ####` para obtener el pull request correspondiente.

En este punto, puedes trabajar en el código. Utiliza `git rebase -i` y `git commit --amend` para asegurarte de que los commits tienen el nivel de calidad esperado. Una vez que estés listo:

/ 

    $ # Pull in the latest changes from main.
    $ git checkout main
    $ git pull upstream main
    $ # Rebase the pull request on main.
    $ git checkout pr/####
    $ git rebase main
    $ git checkout main
    $ # Merge the work as "fast-forward" to main to avoid a merge commit.
    $ # (in practice, you can omit "--ff-only" since you just rebased)
    $ git merge --ff-only pr/XXXX
    $ # If you're not sure if you did things correctly, check that only the
    $ # changes you expect will be pushed to upstream.
    $ git push --dry-run upstream main
    $ # Push!
    $ git push upstream main
    $ # Delete the pull request branch.
    $ git branch -d pr/xxxx

    ...\> REM Pull in the latest changes from main.
    ...\> git checkout main
    ...\> git pull upstream main
    ...\> REM Rebase the pull request on main.
    ...\> git checkout pr/####
    ...\> git rebase main
    ...\> git checkout main
    ...\> REM Merge the work as "fast-forward" to main to avoid a merge commit.
    ...\> REM (in practice, you can omit "--ff-only" since you just rebased)
    ...\> git merge --ff-only pr/XXXX
    ...\> REM If you're not sure if you did things correctly, check that only the
    ...\> REM changes you expect will be pushed to upstream.
    ...\> git push --dry-run upstream main
    ...\> REM Push!
    ...\> git push upstream main
    ...\> REM Delete the pull request branch.
    ...\> git branch -d pr/xxxx

Fuerza el push a la rama después de hacer el rebasing en main pero antes de hacer el merging y el push a upstream. Esto permite que los hashes de commit en main y en la rama coincidan, lo que cierra automáticamente la solicitud de pull.

Si no es necesario fusionar una pull request en varias confirmaciones, puede utilizar el botón «Squash and merge» de GitHub en el sitio web. Edite el mensaje de confirmación según sea necesario para que se ajuste a las directrices y elimine el número de solicitud de extracción que se añade automáticamente a la primera línea del mensaje.

Al reescribir el historial de commits de un pull request, el objetivo es hacer que el historial de commits de Django sea lo más usable posible:

- Si un parche contiene confirmaciones de ida y vuelta, reescríbalas en una sola. Por ejemplo, si una confirmación añade algo de código y una segunda corrige problemas estilísticos introducidos en la primera, esas confirmaciones deben aplastarse antes de fusionarse.

- Separe los cambios en diferentes commits mediante una agrupación lógica: si realiza una limpieza estilística al mismo tiempo que realiza otros cambios en un archivo, separar los cambios en dos commits diferentes facilitará la revisión del historial.

- Cuidado con las fusiones de ramas ascendentes en los pull requests.

- Las pruebas deben pasar y los documentos deben compilarse después de cada confirmación. Ni las pruebas ni los documentos deben emitir advertencias.

- Los parches pequeños y triviales suelen realizarse mejor en una sola confirmación. Los trabajos medianos y grandes pueden dividirse en varias confirmaciones si tiene sentido.

La practicidad vence a la pureza, así que depende de cada fusión decidir cuánta manipulación de la historia hacer para un pull request. Los puntos principales son involucrar a la comunidad, hacer el trabajo y tener un historial de commit utilizable.

## Directrices de compromiso

These guidelines apply to all commits to Django’s Git repository, whether submitted by a contributor via a pull request or landed directly by a merger:

- Nunca cambies el historial publicado de las ramas `django/django` forzando el push. Si es absolutamente necesario (por razones de seguridad, por ejemplo), primero discute la situación con el equipo.

- Para cualquier cambio de mediano a gran escala, donde «mediano a gran escala» queda a su criterio, por favor, coméntelo en el Foro Django antes de realizar el cambio.

  Si plantea algo y nadie responde, por favor, no asuma que su idea es excelente y debe implementarse de inmediato solo por que nadie la cuestiono. No todo el mundo tiene mucho tiempo para leer las discuciones de inmediato, así que es posible que tenga que esperar un par de días antes de recibir una respuesta.

- Write detailed commit messages in the past tense, not present tense, and end the subject line with a period.

  - Correct: «Fixed Unicode bug in RSS API.»

  - Incorrect: «Fixes Unicode bug in RSS API.» (present tense)

  - Incorrect: «Fixing Unicode bug in RSS API.» («-ing» form)

  - Incorrect: «Fixed Unicode bug in RSS API» (missing trailing period)

  The commit message should be in lines of 72 chars maximum. There should be a subject line, separated by a blank line and then paragraphs of 72 char lines. The limits are soft. For the subject line, shorter is better.

  In the body of the commit message more detail is better than less, and should explain why the change was made, not what was changed or how. The code itself shows what changed; the commit message should provide the context and reasoning that the code cannot.

  Credit the contributors in the commit message: «Thanks A for the report and B for review.» Use git’s Co-Authored-By as appropriate, including anyone whose earlier work the change builds on.

  Por ejemplo:

      Fixed #18307 -- Added git workflow guidelines.

      Refactored the Django's documentation to remove mentions of SVN
      specific tasks. Added guidelines of how to use Git, GitHub, and
      how to use pull request together with Trac instead.

      Thanks to Full Name for the report, and to Reviewer for reviews.

- Limit commits to the most granular change that makes sense. This means, use frequent small commits rather than infrequent large commits. For example, if implementing feature X requires a small change to library Y, first commit the change to library Y, then commit feature X in a separate commit. This goes a long way in helping everyone follow your changes.

- Separate bug fixes from feature changes. Bugfixes may need to be backported.

- If your commit closes a ticket in the Django ticket tracker, begin your commit message with the text «Fixed #xxxxx», where «xxxxx» is the number of the ticket your commit fixes. Example: «Fixed #123 – Added whizbang feature.». We’ve rigged Trac so that any commit message in that format will automatically close the referenced ticket and post a comment to it with the full commit message.

  For the curious, we’re using a Trac plugin for this.

Nota

Note that the Trac integration doesn’t know anything about pull requests. So if you try to close a pull request with the phrase «closes #400» in your commit message, GitHub will close the pull request, but the Trac plugin will not close the same numbered ticket in Trac.

- If your commit references a ticket in the Django ticket tracker but does not close the ticket, include the phrase «Refs #xxxxx», where «xxxxx» is the number of the ticket your commit references. This will automatically post a comment to the appropriate ticket.

## Backports

Bug fix backports to stable branches are done exclusively by mergers, following the Supported versions. A backport consists of cherry-picking a commit from `main` onto the target `stable/A.B.x` branch.

A backport commit must include two things beyond the original commit message:

- A prefix `[A.B.x]` on the subject line, where `A.B.x` is the name of the `stable/A.B.x` branch being targeted.

- A suffix `Backport of <sha> from main.` line in the commit body, pointing to the original commit hash.

Por ejemplo:

    [1.3.x] Fixed #17028 -- Changed diveintopython.org -> diveintopython.net.

    Backport of 80c0cbf1c97047daed2c5b41b296bbc56fe1d7e3 from main.

If the backport also fixes a regression, add a line identifying the commit that introduced it:

    Regression in 6ecccad711b52f9273b1acb07a57d3f806e93928.

There are three ways to do a backport, depending on your workflow:

Option 1: fully manual

Cherry-pick the commit onto the stable branch, then amend the commit message to add the required prefix and backport note:

    git cherry-pick <sha>
    git commit --amend

If the cherry-pick produces conflicts, resolve them, stage the changes, then run `git cherry-pick --continue` before amending. This option requires no setup but relies entirely on remembering to format the message correctly.

Option 2: using the helper script in the repo

The `scripts/backport.sh` Bash script automates the cherry-pick and rewrites the commit message with the correct prefix and backport note. Run it from the target stable branch:

    bash scripts/backport.sh <sha>

This is straightforward for clean cherry-picks, but if conflicts are produced, you will need to resolve them manually and add the prefix and backport note to the commit message yourself.

Option 3: using the `prepare-commit-msg` git hook

The `scripts/prepare_commit_msg.py` Python script can be installed as a `prepare-commit-msg` git hook. It automatically adds the `[A.B.x]` prefix to the subject line, appends `Backport of <sha> from main.` to the commit body, and ensures the subject line ends with a period, even when the cherry-pick produces conflicts. To install it, create an executable file `.git/hooks/prepare-commit-msg` containing:

    #!/bin/sh
    exec python scripts/prepare_commit_msg.py "$@"

Once installed, a plain `git cherry-pick <sha>` on a stable branch is sufficient; the hook handles the message formatting in all cases.

## Reverting commits

Nobody’s perfect; mistakes will be committed.

But try very hard to ensure that mistakes don’t happen. Just because we have a reversion policy doesn’t relax your responsibility to aim for the highest quality possible. Really: double-check your work, or have it checked by another merger before you commit it in the first place!

When a mistaken commit is discovered, please follow these guidelines:

- If possible, have the original author revert their own commit.

- Don’t revert another author’s changes without permission from the original author.

- Use git revert – this will make a reverse commit, but the original commit will still be part of the commit history.

- If the original author can’t be reached (within a reasonable amount of time – a day or so) and the problem is severe – crashing bug, major test failures, etc. – then ask for objections on the Django Forum then revert if there are none.

- If the problem is small (a feature commit after feature freeze, say), wait it out.

- If there’s a disagreement between the merger and the reverter-to-be then try to work it out on the Django Forum . If an agreement can’t be reached then it should be put to a vote.

- If the commit introduced a confirmed, disclosed security vulnerability then the commit may be reverted immediately without permission from anyone.

- The release branch maintainer may back out commits to the release branch without permission if the commit breaks the release branch.

- If you mistakenly push a topic branch to `django/django`, delete it. For instance, if you did: `git push upstream feature_antigravity`, do a reverse push: `git push upstream :feature_antigravity`.